Article: There are many different ways to define financial stability. The absence of system-wide episodes in which a crisis occurs is central to financial stability, according to the majority of financial institutes. It also involves financial systems' stress-resilience. It is not created to prevent crisis or stop bad financial decisions. It is there to hold the economy together and keep the system running smoothly while such events are happening.
The foundation of financial stability is the creation of a system that is able to function in both good and bad times and can absorb all of the positive and negative events that happen to the economy at any given time. It has nothing to do with preventing individuals or businesses from failing, losing money, or succeeding. It is merely assisting in the creation of conditions for the system's continued efficient operation in the face of such occurrences.
The economy is one that is constantly changing and expanding, and it is full of businesses that start, grow, and fail: routine activities of the business cycle. Financial markets and financial institutions are considered stable when they are able to provide households, communities, and businesses with the resources, services, and products they require to invest, grow, and participate in a well-functioning economy. Financial institutions include banks, savings and loans, and other financial product and service providers.
A financial system that meets the needs of typical families and businesses to borrow money to buy a house or car, save for retirement, or pay for college is considered to have financial stability. In a similar vein, businesses must take out loans in order to expand, construct factories, recruit new workers, and make payroll. A functioning financial system is needed for all of these things, and it works best when the majority of people don't even give it much thought. Businesses and consumers simply know that they will be able to obtain short-term loans to pay their employees or that they will be able to finance significant expenditures such as the construction of a factory.
The ability to efficiently allot resources, assess and manage financial risks, maintain employment levels close to the natural rate of the economy, and eliminate relative price movements of real or financial assets that will affect monetary stability or employment levels are all features of a financially stable system. Financial imbalances that arise naturally or as a result of significant adverse and unforeseen events are dissipated when a financial system is in a range of stability. When the system is stable, it will primarily absorb shocks through self-corrective mechanisms, preventing adverse events from disrupting the real economy or other financial systems. Because the majority of real-world transactions take place through the financial system, financial stability is absolutely necessary for economic expansion.
Empirical measures Firm-level stability measures
The Altman's z‐score is extensively used in empirical research as a measure of firm-level stability for its high correlation with the probability of default. This measure contrasts buffers (capitalization and returns) with risk (volatility of returns) and has done well at predicting bankruptcies within two years. Despite development of alternative models to predict financial stability Altman's model remains the most widely used.
An alternate model used to measure institution-level stability is the Merton model (also called the asset value model). It evaluates a firm's ability to meet its financial obligations and gauges the overall possibility of default. In this model, an institution's equity is treated as a call option on its held assets, taking into account the volatility of those assets. Put-call parity is used to price the value of the implied “put” option, which represents the firm's credit risk. Ultimately, the model measures the value of the firm's assets (weighted for volatility) at the time that the debtholders exercises their “put option” by expecting repayment. Implicitly, the model defines default as when the value of a firm's liabilities exceeds that of its assets calculate the probability of credit default. In different iterations of the model, the asset/liability level could be set at different threshold levels.
In subsequent research, Merton's model has been modified to capture a wider array of financial activity using credit default swap data. For example, Moody's uses it in the KMV model both to calculate the probability of credit default and as part of their credit risk management system. The Distance to Default (DD) is another market-based measure of corporate default risk based on Merton's model. It measures both solvency risk and liquidity risk at the firm level.
Systemic stability measures
Unfortunately, there is not yet a singular, standardized model for assessing financial system stability and for examining policies.
To measure systemic stability, a number of studies attempt to aggregate firm-level stability measures (z-score and distance to default) into a system-wide evaluation of stability, either by taking a simple average or weighing each measure by the institution's relative size. However, these aggregate measures fail to account for correlated risks among financial institutions. In other words, the model fails to consider the inter-connectedness between institutions, and that one institution's failure can lead to a contagion.
The First-to-Default probability, or the probability of observing one default among a number of institutions, has been proposed as a measure of systemic risk for a group of large financial institutions. This measure looks at risk-neutral default probabilities from credit default swap spreads. Unlike distance-to-default measures, the probability recognizes the interconnectedness among defaults of different institutions. However, studies focusing on probabilities of default tend to overlook the ripper effect caused by the failing of a large institution.
Another assessment of financial system stability is Systemic Expected Shortfall (SES), which measures the contribution to systemic risk by individual institutions. SES considers individual leverage level and measures the externalities created from the banking sector when these institutions fail. The model is especially apt at identifying which institutions are systemically relevant and would impact the most on the economy when it fails. One drawback of the SES method is that it is difficult to determine when the systemically important institutions are likely to fail.
To enhance predictive power, the retrospective SES measure was extended and modified in later research. The enhanced model is called SRISK, which evaluates the expected capital shortfall for a firm in a crisis scenario. To calculate this SRISK, one should first determine the Long-Run Marginal Expected Shortfall (LRMES), which measures the relationship between a firm's equity returns and the market's return (estimated using asymmetric volatility, correlation, and copula). Then, the model estimates the drop in the firm's equity value if the aggregate market experiences a 40% or larger fall in a six-month period to determine how much capital is needed in order to achieve an 8% capital to asset value ratio. In other words, SRISK gives insights into the firm's percentage of total financial sector capital shortfall. A high SRISK % indicates the biggest losers when a crisis strikes. One implication of the SES indicator is that a firm is considered “systemically risky” if it faces a high probability of capital shortage when the financial sector is weak.
Another gauge of financial stability is the distribution of systemic loss, which attempts to fill some of the gaps of the aforementioned measures. This measure incorporates three key elements: each individual institution's probability of default, the size of loss given a default, and the contagion resulting from defaults interconnected institutions.
References |
Source: Skip to Main Navigation
Global Search Search button WHO WE ARE
Leadership, organization, and history
WHAT WE DO
Projects, products, and services
WHERE WE WORK Countries and regions UNDERSTANDING POVERTY
Global data and statistics, research and publications, and topics in poverty and development
WORK WITH US
Jobs, procurement, training, and events
News
The World Bank’s digital platform for live-streaming
WHO WE ARE
With 189 member countries, staff from more than 170 countries, and offices in over 130 locations, the World Bank Group is a unique global partnership: five institutions working for sustainable solutions that reduce poverty and build shared prosperity in developing countries.
About the World Bank
Overview Organization Partners History Archives Anti-Racism Charter Accountability Annual Reports Access to Information Accountability Mechanism Corporate Scorecard Data Privacy
World Bank Group Finances
Integrity Vice Presidency Inspection Panel Grievance Redress Service Independent Evaluation Group Compliance Advisor Ombudsman Policies and Procedures Experts And Leaders
Office of the President
Boards of Governors Boards of Directors Leadership Experts News WHAT WE DO
The World Bank Group works in every major area of development. We provide a wide array of financial products and technical assistance, and we help countries share and apply innovative knowledge and solutions to the challenges they face.
Development Projects Projects By Country By Sector By Theme Country Engagement
Environmental and Social Policies for Projects
Procurement for Projects and Programs
Results Priorities Climate Food Security Human Capital
International Development Association (IDA)
COVID-19 Hub Knowledge Research & Publications Data Learning Development Topics Open Knowledge Repository Trust Fund Directory Products & Services
Financing Products & Advisory Services
Treasury Asset Management WHERE WE WORK Countries country dropdown Afghanistan Albania shqip Algeria Français عربي Angola Português Antigua and Barbuda Argentina Español Armenia Austria Azerbaijan Bahrain Bangladesh Belarus Русский Belgium Français Belize Benin Français Bhutan Bolivia Español Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana Brazil Português Bulgaria Български Burkina Faso Français Burundi Français Cabo Verde Português Cambodia ភាសាខ្មែរ Cameroon Français Canada Français Central African Republic Français Chad Français Chile Español China 中文 Colombia Español Comoros Français
Democratic Republic of Congo
Français Republic of Congo Français Costa Rica Español Cote d'Ivoire Français Croatia Czech Republic Denmark Djibouti Dominica Dominican Republic Español Ecuador Español Egypt عربي El Salvador Español Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Estonia Ethiopia Europe (Western) Fiji Finland France Français Gabon Français The Gambia Georgia Germany Ghana Greece Grenada Guatemala Español Guinea Français Guinea-Bissau Português Guyana Haiti Français Honduras Español Hungary Iceland India Hindi Indonesia Bahasa Iran Iraq عربي Israel Italy Jamaica Japan 日本語 Jordan عربي Kazakhstan Русский Kenya Kiribati Korea Kosovo Kuwait Kyrgyz Republic Русский Lao PDR Latvia Lebanon عربي Lesotho Liberia Libya عربي Lithuania Luxembourg Français FYR of Macedonia македонски Madagascar Français Malawi Malaysia Maldives Mali Français Marshall Islands Mauritania Français Mauritius Français Mexico Español FS Micronesia Moldova română Mongolia Монгол Montenegro Morocco عربي Français Mozambique Português Myanmar Namibia Nepal Netherlands Nicaragua Español Niger Français Nigeria Norway Oman Pakistan Palau Panama Español Papua New Guinea Paraguay Español Peru Español Philippines Poland Polski Portugal Qatar Romania Română Russia Русский Rwanda Français Samoa
Sao Tome and Principe
Português Senegal Français Serbia Seychelles Français Sierra Leone Singapore Slovak Republic Slovenia Solomon Islands Somalia South Africa South Sudan Spain Español Sri Lanka
St. Kitts and Nevis
St. Lucia
St. Vincent and Grenadines
Sudan Suriname Swaziland Sweden Switzerland Syria عربي Tajikistan Русский Tanzania Thailand ภาษาไทย
Timor Leste (East Timor)
Togo Français Tonga Trinidad and Tobago Tunisia عربي Français Turkey Türkçe Turkmenistan Русский Tuvalu Uganda Ukraine Yкраїнський United Arab Emirates United Kingdom
United States of America
Uruguay Español Uzbekistan Русский Vanuatu Venezuela Español Vietnam Tiẽng Việt
West Bank and Gaza
عربي Yemen عربي Zambia Zimbabwe Recent Searches Regions Africa
East Asia and Pacific
Europe and Central Asia
Latin America and Caribbean
Middle East and North Africa
South Asia Country Groups European Union Middle Income Countries
Organization of Eastern Caribbean States
Pacific Islands Small States Gulf Cooperation Council Western Europe UNDERSTANDING POVERTY
We face big challenges to help the world’s poorest people and ensure that everyone sees benefits from economic growth. Data and research help us understand these challenges and set priorities, share knowledge of what works, and measure progress.
Data & Research Open Data By Country By Indicator Research & Publications Development Topics Climate Change Agriculture and Food
Fragility, Conflict, and Violence
Poverty Debt Education Health Energy Food Security All Development Topics Search button WORK WITH US For Job Seekers Jobs Programs & Internships For Partners Partners
Corporate and Private Foundations
Clients Private Sector Corporate Procurement Civil Society Consultations Parliamentarians For Investors
World Bank Bonds & Investment Products
Treasury For Learners Open Learning Campus Meet Us Events World Bank Live Speaker's Bureau
Spring & Annual Meetings
Contacts & Inquiries global Search dropdown Search Search button Page Not Found 404 Error
The page you requested could not be found. Try using the search box below or click on the homepage button to go there.
Search button GO TO HOMEPAGE Who We Are Data Research and Publications Learning News Projects and Operations Countries Topics FOLLOW US Follow us newsletter SUBSCRIBE HERE This Site in: English Español Français عربي Русский 中文 View All » Legal Privacy Notice Site Accessibility Access to Information Jobs Contact SCAM ALERTS
REPORT FRAUD OR CORRUPTION
IBRD IDA IFC MIGA ICSID ©
The World Bank, All Rights Reserved. |